Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's surprise announcement of their return to the United Kingdom immediately reignited debate over whether the couple should receive publicly funded police protection during their visits.
When the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and relocated to the United States, they lost their automatic entitlement to Metropolitan Police protection. A fresh decision will now be required on the level of security they are entitled to receive at public expense, a question that has proven politically and constitutionally sensitive.
Harry has pursued legal action in the UK over his security arrangements, arguing his family faces real and ongoing threats that warrant professional police protection. His legal challenges have produced mixed results.
Critics of publicly funded protection argue that Harry and Meghan's decision to leave royal life and commercialize their stories removes the basis for taxpayer-supported security. Supporters counter that the couple faces genuine security risks connected to their former royal status and public prominence. The government has not yet commented on what security arrangements will be put in place for the couple's stay.
We use cookies to improve your experience. Privacy Policy