🗞️🔖👤

Anti-Corruption Court Removes Yermak's Monitoring Bracelet

📅 Sep 15, 2026⏱ 2 min read💬 0 comments🔴 Live updates

VAKS Removes Yermak's Ankle Bracelet

Ukraine's High Anti-Corruption Court, known by its Ukrainian acronym VAKS, has removed an electronic monitoring bracelet from Andriy Yermak, the head of the Presidential Office. The court ruled that the device posed a threat to his life and health.

Yermak is one of the most senior figures in Ukraine's wartime leadership structure, serving as chief of staff to President Volodymyr Zelensky. The existence of an electronic monitoring bracelet indicated Yermak was subject to some form of court-ordered supervision under Ukrainian criminal procedure law.

Court Decision and Legal Context

Under Ukrainian law, electronic monitoring bracelets are used as a preventive measure in criminal proceedings, typically as an alternative to detention. When a court determines the physical wearing of such a device creates a demonstrable risk to the monitored individual's health, it can order the device removed.

VAKS is the specialized court in Ukraine's anti-corruption judicial system, established to handle cases involving high-level corruption offenses. The court operates alongside the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office.

The court's decision to remove the bracelet on health grounds does not necessarily mean the underlying legal proceedings have been concluded or that other restrictions on Yermak have been lifted. Ukrainian courts routinely adjust preventive measures when medical or safety justifications are presented.

Significance

The involvement of the head of the Presidential Office in active anti-corruption court proceedings represents a notable development in Ukrainian institutional affairs during the wartime period. Yermak has been a central figure in Ukraine's foreign policy and wartime governance since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022.

Further details about the nature of the proceedings in which Yermak's monitoring measure was imposed were not included in the available public reporting on this court decision.

Discussion 0

We use cookies to improve your experience. Privacy Policy